PublicationsTurfgrass Report

Postemergence Broadleaf Control Trial II 2002

Nick E. Christians and Luke Dant

The purpose of this study was to evaluate weed control and turf phytotoxicity of Scotts Turf Builder with Plus 2 Weed Control to other competitive granular broadleaf herbicides. The research was conducted at the Iowa State University Turfgrass Research Facility on 'Park' Kentucky bluegrass.

The trial design was a randomized complete block. The plots were 10 ft x 5 ft and each treatment was replicated 3 times. The Scotts Company provided all products and each product was applied per the instructions on the label. The application was made when dandelions were flowering but before they had produced "puff-balls". All treatments were applied on May 14 while there was still dew on the weed foliage. All products were applied using 'shaker dispensers'. The soil on the area is a Nicollett (fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Aquic Hapludoll) with 4.6 % organic matter, 6 ppm P, 169 ppm K, and a pH of 7.05.

Weed phytotoxicity was reported two weeks after application on June 28. This was reported on a percent scale, 0% being no damage and 100% being dead. Dandelion and clover cover was recorded 4 and 8 weeks after application on June 11 and July 9. These data were reported on a percentage basis with 0% meaning there were no weeds present and 100% meaning the entire plot was covered by weeds. Turf Quality was taken 2, 4 and 8 weeks after application on a scale of 9-1 (9 = Excellent, 6 = Acceptable, 1 = Worst).

Data were analyzed using Statistical Analysis System and the Analysis of Variance procedure. Treatments effects were tested using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test.

Weeds treated by all materials showed some damage two weeks after the application. However, none of the damage was statistically significant between the treatments. All of the herbicides used in the study reduced dandelion populations in comparison with the control. No particular product appeared to have greater activity on dandelions than any other product. As with dandelions, all the treatments reduced clover populations significantly. Preen'n Green Lawns provided the best clover control on June 11, 4 weeks after application By July 9, both Preen'n Green Lawns and S-10218 exhibited the best numerical control of clover but there were no statistically significant differences among herbicide treatments. There was not a large differences in turf quality among the treated plots at any time during the study.

Table 1. 2002 Postemergence broadleaf control trial II treatments.

 MaterialTotal Active IngredientsActive Ingredients
1Untreated controlNANA
2Scotts Turf Builder with Plus 2 Weed Control S-102191.81%2,4-D (1.21%)
MCPP-p (0.6%)
3S-102181.89%2,4-D (1.21%)
MCPP-p (0.6%)
Dicamba (0.08%)
4Vigoro Weed & Feed0.85%2,4-D (1.21%)
MCPP (0.27%)
Dicamba (0.03%)
5Sta-green 200 + Weed & Feed0.98%2,4-D (0.64%)
MCPP (0.31%)
Dicamba (0.03%)
6Sam's Choice Weed & Feed1.14%2,4-D (0.56%)
MCPP (0.29%)
2,4-DP (0.29%)
7Preen'n Green Lawns1.93%Benefin (0.82%)
Trifluralin (0.43%)
Triclopyr (0.5%)
Clopyralid (0.18%)
8Lesco Weed & Feed1.14%2,4-D (0.56%)
MCPP (0.29%)
2,4-DP (0.29%)

Table 2. Quality ratings and broadleaf cover in the 2002 postemergence broadleaf control trial II.

 RateWeed Phytotoxicity% Dandelion Cover% Clover CoverTurf Quality
 Materiallb a.i./A5/286/117/096/117/09 5/286/117/09
1Untreated controlNA038193821445
2Scotts Turf Builder with Plus 2 Weed Control S-102192.251282256666
3S-102182.251283131656
4Vigoro Weed & Feed1.1813123177666
5Sta-green 200+ Weed & Feed1.3712177234676
6Sam's Choice Weed & Feed1.797175376676
7Preen'n Green Lawns3.0388241666
8Lesco Weed & Feed1.9910133258566
 
 LSD 0.05 NS99177.2NS1.2NS


Iowa State University ISU Turfgrass:2003 Turfgrass Report College of Agriculture