Kentucky Bluegrass Traffic Study

D.D. Minner and F.J. Valverde

Objective

To determine the effect that different traffic schedules have on Kentucky bluegrass performance. Specifically we were interested in determining if the same amount of traffic caused more injury if it was applied all-at-once (one day per week) or spread out over time (a little each day).

Methods

The study was conducted at the Horticulture Research Farm in Ames Iowa during summer and fall of 2001. Six different traffic regimes were applied to Kentucky Bluegrass (Table 1) with a GA-SWC Traffic simulator (Carrow et al., 2001). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with 7 treatments and 3 replications. Each small plot was 2 ft x 12 ft. Traffic simulation started on 1 August and ended on 7 November, 2001.

Table 1. Traffic schedule followed on Kentucky bluegrass during fall 2001.

Number of passes/week

Number of passes per day

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

5 dispersed

1

1

1

1

1

10 dispersed

2

2

2

2

2

15 dispersed

3

3

3

3

3

5 concentrated

0

0

0

0

5

10 concentrated

0

0

0

0

10

15 concentrated

0

0

0

0

15

Control

0

0

0

0

0

Percent turf cover and quality were evaluated monthly. Sometimes conditions were too wet to operate the traffic simulator. Traffic not done during those days accumulated to the next available day.

Results

Table 2. Kentucky bluegrass cover as affected by traffic schedule

Traffic schedule

8/28/01

9/11/01

9/24/01

10/8/01

11/21/01

Overall

% Turf cover

Control

100

100

100

100

100

100.0

5 dispersed

93

93

95

96

92

93.8

10 dispersed

73

73

75

83

63

73.7

15 dispersed

57

52

63

57

35

52.7

5 concentrated

98

96

97

95

95

96.1

10 concentrated

93

88

77

85

85

85.7

15 concentrated

63

62

50

50

55

56.0

Prob.

0.0000

LSD 0.05

2.83

 

Table 3. Kentucky bluegrass quality as affected by traffic schedule

Traffic schedule

8/21/01

8/28/01

9/11/01

9/24/01

10/8/01

11/21/01

Overall

Quality

Control

10.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

9.2

9.3

9.8

5 dispersed

8.3

8.3

8.0

8.7

7.7

6.8

8.0

10 dispersed

6.7

7.0

6.3

6.0

6.0

4.0

6.0

15 dispersed

6.7

5.7

4.7

5.7

3.7

2.3

4.8

5 concentrated

8.7

8.7

8.3

8.3

7.2

7.5

8.1

10 concentrated

8.0

7.7

7.3

6.7

6.3

6.3

7.1

15 concentrated

6.0

5.8

5.3

4.7

3.3

3.3

4.8

Quality 1-10 (10 most desirable situation, 1 not suitable for sport)

Prob

0.0000

LSD 0.05

0.336

Turf cover decreased as the amount of traffic increased. At 10 and 15 passes per week more turf cover occurred with concentrated traffic compared to disperse traffic (table 2). Similar situation occurs on turf quality (table 3). Although this is not evident in the data, there may have been a complicating factor caused by the unpredictable rainfall events. Traffic treatments applied during wetter conditions may have caused more damage. In 2001 we will conduct the same levels of traffic under wet vs. dry conditions by controlling rainfall with tarps.

Literature cited

Carrow, R.N., R.R. Duncan, J.E. Worley and R.C. Shearman. 2001. Turfgrass traffic (soil compaction plus wear) simulator response of Paspalum vaginatum and Cynodon spp. p. 253-258. In K. Carey (ed.). Int. Turf. Soc. Research J. vol. 9.




Iowa State University ISU Horticulture:Publications:2002 Turfgrass Report College of Agriculture

Iowa State University

106 Horticulture Hall
Ames, Iowa 50011
Phone: (515) 294-2751
Fax: (515) 294-0730
Website or Department-related Questions/Comments: hortdept@iastate.edu
Plant Questions: hortline@iastate.edu

Contents ©1995-2003, ISU Horticulture Department