Dimension Safety on Bentgrass/Poa annua Greens

B. R. Bingaman, T. R. Oster, and N. E. Christians

These field trials were designed to measure the quality of creeping bentgrass on sand and soil-based greens following treatment with dithiopyr at three different rates. Two studies were conducted at Veenker Golf Course in Ames, IA on creeping bentgrass practice greens infested with Poa annua. One study was established on a sand-based and another on a soil-based green. Individual plot size was 5 x 5 ft and three replications were run. For both studies, Dimension (Dithiopyr) was applied at 0.25, 0.50 and 1.00 lb a.i./A on May 1, 2001. The material was applied using a 'shaker dispenser' to ensure uniform coverage.

The studies were monitored for turf quality and phytotoxicity from May 15 through September 5 (Tables 1 and 2). Turf quality was assessed using a 9 to 1 scale with 9 = best, 6 = lowest acceptable and 1 = worst quality. No phytotoxicity was observed. Control of Poa annua was recorded from May 15 through September 5 (Tables 3 and 4). Populations were determined by estimating the percentage of area per plot covered by Poa annua. The small population on the soil-based green died out and/or was overgrown by bentgrass beginning mid July. Some regrowth was observed on September 5.

To quantify possible treatment effects on Poa annua seedhead formation, differences in the percentage of Poa annua seed head formation per plot were noted for the sand-based green study on May 15, June 15, July 11, and July 24 (Table 5). The Poa annua on the soil-based green did not produce seed heads.

The soil-based green was core aerified on August 15 and large cores (approximately 3/4" diameter) were removed. There were obvious differences in recovery from the aerification and these were noted on August 24 and August 28 (Table 6). Recovery was assessed using a 9 to 1 scale with 9 = 100% recovery, 5 = 50% recovery, and 1 = 0% recovery.

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute Inc., 1989-1996) and the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) procedure. Treatment effects on Poa annua populations and visual quality were tested using Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) means comparison test. In addition, orthogonal contrasts were conducted using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure to provide means comparisons among individual treatments (Tables 7-10).

Sand-based Green:

No phytotoxicity was observed on the treated bentgrass. Enhanced turf quality was observed in bentgrass treated with Dimension at 0.25 lb a.i./A on May 15 and May 23 as compared with the other treated and untreated bentgrass (Table 1). On June 6, bentgrass treated with either Dimension at 0.50 or at 1.00 lb a.i./A had better quality than the other treated and untreated turf. After June 6, quality was similar for all treated and untreated bentgrass.

There were numerical reductions in Poa annua cover among the treated and untreated plots, but the differences were statistically significant for only June 6 and August 15 (Table 3). On these dates, Dimension at 1.00 lb a.i./A provided the best numerical control but the level of control was not different from that caused by the other Dimension treatments.

There were significant differences in percentage Poa annua seedhead formation for June 15, July 11, and July 24 (Table 5). On June 15 and July 11, there were less seedheads in bentgrass treated with Dimension at 0.25 lb a.i./A but there were more in bentgrass treated with Dimension at 0.50 and 1.00 lb a.i./A as compared with the untreated controls. Mean data show that there was significantly more seedhead formation in bentgrass treated with Dimension at 0.50 or 1.00 lb a.i./A than in bentgrass treated at 0.25 lb a.i./A or untreated.

The orthogonal contrasts provide additional information on statistical differences in Poa annua cover by giving probabilities of > T values for pairwise comparisons among the treatments (Table 7). On June 1, June 15, August 15, and August 24 the differences between percentage cover in untreated bentgrass were statistically different than in bentgrass treated with Dimension at 1.00 lb a.i./A.

Soil-based Green:

No phytotoxicity was observed on the treated bentgrass. Numerical improvements in turf quality were recorded through September 5 but these differences were statistically significant for only June 1, June 6, and June 15 (Table 2). On these dates, turf quality was best for bentgrass treated with Dimension at 1.00 lb a.i./A as compared with the other treated and untreated areas.

There were reductions in Poa annua cover in treated bentgrass as compared to untreated but the differences were not statistically significant (Table 4). The Poa annua population on this green was rather sporadic and appeared to die out by early August. In addition, the population within the experimental area and surrounding it did not form seedheads.

Core aerification performed on August 15 resulted in significant differences in recovery rates (Table 6). On August 24, bentgrass treated with either Dimension at 0.50 or 1.00 lb a.i./A had significantly less recovery from aerification By August 28, the cores were still only 75% regrown in bentgrass treated with Dimension at 1.00 lb a.i./A. The cores in all other treated and untreated areas had completely recovered.

Table 1. Turf quality1 of creeping bentgrass on a sand-based green treated for the 2001 Dimension Safety study.

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

May

10

May

15

May

23

June

1

June

6

June

15

June

24

June

29

July

3

1.

Untreated control

NA

8.0

7.7

7.3

6.3

7.3

7.7

8.0

7.7

8.0

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

8.0

9.0

8.0

7.3

7.0

7.7

8.0

7.3

8.0

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

8.0

7.0

7.3

7.7

8.7

7.7

8.0

8.3

8.0

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

8.7

7.3

7.7

8.3

8.7

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

 

LSD0.05

 

p>F=0.07

0.6

0.9

NS

1.3

0.7

NS

NS

NS

--

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

July

11

July

24

Aug

3

Aug

10

Aug

15

Aug

24

Aug

28

Sept

5

Mean

1.

Untreated control

NA

9.0

9.0

8.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

8.7

7.9

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

9.0

9.0

8.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

8.0

8.0

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

9.0

9.0

8.0

7.0

8.0

8.7

9.0

8.0

8.1

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

9.0

9.0

8.0

7.0

8.0

8.3

9.0

8.3

8.2

 

LSD0.05

 

--

--

--

--

--

NS

--

NS

0.2

1Turf quality was assessed using a 9 to 1 scale with 9 = best, 6 = lowest acceptable, and 1 = worst quality.

Materials applied on May 1, 2001

NS = means are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

-- = means comparisons tests are not valid for these data.

Table 2. Turf quality1 of creeping bentgrass on a soil-based green treated for the 2001 Dimension Safety study.

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

May

10

May

15

May

23

June

1

June

6

June

15

June

27

July

3

July

11

1.

Untreated control

NA

8.0

7.0

6.0

6.0

6.3

7.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

8.0

8.0

8.0

7.3

6.3

7.3

7.3

7.3

9.0

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

9.0

8.0

8.0

7.7

6.7

9.0

7.7

7.7

9.0

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

9.0

9.0

9.0

8.7

7.7

9.0

8.7

8.3

9.0

 

LSD0.05

 

--

--

--

2.5

0.7

1.6

NS

NS

--

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

July

16

July

24

Aug

3

Aug

10

Aug

17

Aug

24

Aug

28

Sept

5

Mean

1.

Untreated control

NA

8.7

8.3

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.3

8.7

7.7

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

9.0

8.3

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.7

7.9

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

9.0

8.7

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.3

8.7

8.2

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

8.7

8.7

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

8.5

 

LSD0.05

 

NS

NS

--

--

--

--

NS

NS

0.3

1Turf quality was assessed using a 9 to 1 scale with 9 = best, 6 = lowest acceptable, and 1 = worst quality.

Materials applied on May 1, 2001

NS = means are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

-- = means comparisons tests are not valid for these data.

 

Table 3. Percentage Poa annua cover1 in creeping bentgrass on a sand-based green treated for the 2001 Dimension Safety study.

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

May

15

May

23

June

1

June

6

June

15

June

24

June

29

July

3

1.

Untreated control

NA

36.7

38.3

45.0

45.0

51.7

41.7

33.3

23.3

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

35.0

33.3

33.3

41.7

35.0

31.7

30.0

28.3

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

50.0

41.7

30.0

36.7

45.0

40.0

33.3

33.3

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

53.3

40.0

23.3

30.0

31.7

31.7

31.7

30.0

 

LSD0.05

 

NS

NS

NS

p>F=0.08

11.7

NS

NS

NS

NS

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

July

11

July

24

Aug

3

Aug

10

Aug

15

Aug

24

Aug

28

Sept

5

Mean

1.

Untreated control

NA

20.0

28.3

30.0

35.0

25.0

18.3

15.0

5.7

30.8

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

30.0

33.3

28.3

26.7

10.0

10.0

10.0

6.7

26.5

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

31.7

30.0

28.3

26.7

16.7

15.0

10.0

7.0

29.7

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

33.3

38.3

36.7

20.0

8.3

6.7

6.7

6.7

26.8

 

LSD0.05

 

NS

NS

NS

NS

p>F=0.08

13.4

NS

NS

NS

NS

1These data represent the percentage area per plot covered by Poa annua.

Materials applied on May 1, 2001

NS = means are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

Table 4. Percentage Poa annua cover1 in creeping bentgrass on a soil-based green treated for the 2001 Dimension Safety study.

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

May

15

May

23

June

1

June

6

June

15

July

3

July

11

1.

Untreated control

NA

7.3

10.3

11.7

11.7

10.0

2.3

2.3

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

2.3

4.0

6.7

16.7

15.0

2.3

2.3

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

4.0

5.7

8.3

13.3

16.7

2.3

2.3

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

1.0

3.7

5.0

10.0

15.0

1.0

1.0

 

LSD0.05

 

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

July

16

July

24

Aug

3

Aug

10

Aug

24

Aug

28

Sept

5

Mean

1.

Untreated control

NA

5.0

2.3

0.3

0.3

0.0

0.0

1.0

4.6

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

6.7

2.3

0.3

0.3

0.0

0.0

2.3

4.4

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

6.7

4.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.7

4.8

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

5.0

3.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.3

3.4

 

LSD0.05

 

NS

NS

NS

NS

--

--

NS

NS

1These data represent the percentage area per plot covered by Poa annua.

Materials applied on May 1, 2001

NS = means are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

-- = means comparisons tests are not valid for these data.

Table 5. Percentage Poa annua seedhead formation1 in creeping bentgrass on a sand-based green treated for the 2001 Dimension

Safety study.

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

May

15

June

15

July

11

July

24

Mean

1.

Untreated control

NA

36.7

25.0

0.0

6.7

17.1

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

20.0

10.0

3.3

18.3

12.9

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

31.7

46.7

20.0

18.3

29.2

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

38.3

35.0

50.0

26.7

37.5

 

LSD0.05

 

NS

5.8

9.6

14.2

12.0

1These data represent the percentage of Poa annua plants per plot that were forming seedheads.

Materials applied on May 1, 2001

NS = means are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

 

Table 6. Recovery from core aerification1 in creeping bentgrass on a soil-based green treated for the 2001 Dimension Safety study.

 

 

Material

Rate

lb a.i./A

August

24

August

28

Mean

1.

Untreated control

NA

8.0

9.0

8.5

2.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.25

7.3

9.0

8.2

3.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

0.50

7.0

9.0

8.0

4.

Dimension (10-3-10) 0.164% a.i.

1.00

3.3

7.3

5.3

 

LSD0.05

 

0.9

0.6

0.6

1The recovery from aerification was assessed using a 9 to 1 scale with 9 = full recovery, 5 = 50% recovery, 1 = no recovery.

Materials applied on May 1, 2001

Table 7. Probabilities for > T comparing percentage Poa annua cover in creeping bentgrass on a sand-based green treated for the 2001 Andersons Dimension Safety Study.

 

Material

 

May

15

May

23

June

1

June

6

June

15

June

24

June

29

July

3

July

11

Untreated control vs treatments

0.1851

0.9983

0.0486

0.0610

0.0915

0.2731

0.8425

0.1009

0.0883

Untreated control vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.8376

06140

0.1961

0.5102

0.1085

0.2231

0.7463

0.3153

0..0252

Untreated control vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.1377

0.7351

0.1107

0.1308

0.4796

0.8284

1.0000

0.0710

0.1485

Untreated control vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.0761

0.8652

0.0355

0.0198

0.0645

0.2231

0.8710

0.1944

0.1070

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.1145

0.4186

0.9242

0.2896

0.3293

0.3529

0.7422

0.8841

0.7879

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.1024

0.4096

0.6922

03343

0.3014

0.3007

0.7463

0.3153

0.8207

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.1024

0.4096

0.6922

0.3343

0.3014

0.3007

0.7463

0.3153

0.8207

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.0567

0.5050

0.2590

0.0498

0.7193

1.0000

0.8710

0.7275

0.6525

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.2438

0.5860

0.5845

0.6031

0.4650

0.4344

0.8425

0.1537

0.5296

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.1377

0.7351

0.1107

0.1308

0.4796

0.8244

1.0000

0.0710

0.1485

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.1024

0.4096

0.6922

0.3343

0.3014

0.3007

0.7463

0.3153

0.8207

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.6836

0.8652

0.4378

0.2111

0.1824

0.3007

0.8710

0.4927

0.8207

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.0931

0.7857

0.1002

0.0293

0.1412

0.3468

0.9460

0.6796

0.3318

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.0761

0.8652

0.0355

0.0198

0.0645

0.2231

0.8710

0.1944

0.1070

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.0567

0.5050

0.2590

0.0498

0.7193

1.0000

0.8710

0.7275

0.6525

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.6836

0.8652

0.4378

0.2111

0.1824

0.3007

0.8710

0.4927

0.8207

 

Table 8. Probabilities for > T comparing percentage Poa annua cover in creeping bentgrass on a sand-based green treated for the 2001 Andersons Dimension Safety Study.

 

Material

 

July

24

Aug

3

Aug

10

Aug

15

Aug

24

Aug

28

Sept

5

Mean

Untreated control vs treatments

0.2798

0.8115

0.3158

0.0245

0.1388

0.1509

0.7773

0.4979

Untreated control vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.4198

0.7811

0.5087

0.0340

0.1880

0.3153

0.8349

0.4486

Untreated control vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.7825

0.7811

0.5087

0.1795

0.5742

0.3153

0.7814

0.8483

Untreated control vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.1340

0.2891

0.2530

0.0229

0.0828

0.1177

0.8349

0.4807

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.8311

0.4970

0.9618

0.1920

0.5026

0.8943

0.9551

0.5712

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.5847

1.0000

1.0000

0.2699

0.4072

1.0000

0.9445

0.5638

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.5847

1.0000

1.0000

0.2699

0.4072

1.0000

0.9445

0.5638

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.4198

0.1963

0.5945

0.7715

0.5742

0.4927

1.0000

0.9551

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.4999

0.4970

0.9618

0.6284

0.4881

0.8943

0.8655

0.7058

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.7825

0.7811

0.5087

0.1795

0.5742

0.3153

0.7814

0.8483

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.5847

1.0000

1.0000

0.2699

0.7072

1.0000

0.9445

0.5638

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.1990

0.1963

0.5945

0.1795

0.1880

0.4927

0.9445

0.6009

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.1498

0.1474

0.3685

0.0946

0.1402

0.2296

0.9558

0.6283

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.1340

0.2891

0.2530

0.0229

0.0828

0.1177

0.8349

0.4807

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.4198

0.1963

0.5945

0.7715

0.5742

0.4927

1.0000

0.9551

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.1990

0.1963

0.5945

0.1795

0.1880

0.4927

0.9445

0.6009

 

Table 9. Probabilities for > T comparing percentage Poa annua cover in creeping bentgrass on a soil-based green treated

for the 2001 Andersons Dimension Safety Study.

 

Material

 

May

15

May

23

June

1

June

6

June

15

July

3

July

11

July

16

Untreated control vs treatments

0.2398

0.2773

0.2612

0.6623

0.5676

0.7454

0.7454

0.4825

Untreated control vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.3190

0.3351

0.3517

0.2948

0.6721

1.0000

1.0000

0.3903

Untreated control vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.4962

0.4694

0.5260

0.7152

0.5748

1.0000

1.0000

0.3903

Untreated control vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.2180

0.3123

0.2270

0.7152

0.6721

04454

04454

1.0000

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.6585

0.6270

0.7003

0.2082

0.9085

0.7454

0.7454

0.4762

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.7297

0.7920

0.7480

0.4732

0.8870

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.7297

0.7920

0.7480

0.4732

0.8870

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.7818

0.9578

0.7480

0.1768

1.0000

0.4454

0.4454

0.3903

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.9046

0.9520

0.8900

0.8751

0.7302

0.7454

0.7454

0.4762

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.4962

0.4694

0.5260

0.7152

0.5748

1.0000

1.0000

0.3903

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.7297

0.7920

0.7480

0.4732

0.8870

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.5387

0.7520

0.5260

0.4732

0.8870

0.4454

0.4454

0.3903

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.3813

0.5668

0.3741

0.3169

0.9099

0.3559

0.3559

0.4762

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.2180

0.3123

0.2270

0.7152

0.6721

0.4454

0.4454

1.0000

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.7818

0.9578

0.7480

0.1768

1.0000

0.4454

0.4454

0.3903

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.5387

0.7520

0.5260

0.4732

0.8870

0.4454

0.4454

0.3903

 

Table 10. Probabilities for > T comparing percentage Poa annua cover in creeping bentgrass on a soil-based green treated

for the 2001 Andersons Dimension Safety Study.

 

Material

 

July

24

Aug

3

Aug

10

Aug

24

Aug

28

Sept

5

Mean

Untreated control vs treatments

0.6505

0.4762

0.4762

-------

-------

0.2743

0.8327

Untreated control vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

-------

-------

0.4881

0.9249

Untreated control vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.5419

0.3903

0.3903

-------

-------

0.1901

0.9474

Untreated control vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.6236

0.3903

0.3903

-------

-------

0.4881

0.6341

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.6505

0.4762

0.4762

-------

-------

1.0000

0.9537

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.5419

0.3903

0.3903

-------

-------

0.4881

0.8728

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.5419

0.3903

0.3903

-------

-------

0.4881

0.8728

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.6236

0.3903

0.3903

-------

-------

1.0000

0.7010

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.5854

0.4825

0.4825

-------

-------

0.2743

0.7507

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.5419

0.3903

0.3903

-------

-------

0.1901

0.9474

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.5419

0.3903

0.3903

-------

-------

0.4881

0.8728

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A

0.9014

1.0000

1.0000

-------

-------

0.4881

0.5894

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

untreated & other treatments

0.7282

0.4825

0.4825

-------

-------

0.9931

0.5688

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

untreated control

0.6236

0.3903

0.3903

-------

-------

0.4881

0.6341

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.25 lb a.i./A

0.6236

0.3903

0.3903

-------

-------

1.0000

0.7010

Dimension @1.00 lb a.i./A vs

Dimension @0.50 lb a.i./A

0.9014

1.0000

1.0000

-------

-------

0.4881

0.5894




Iowa State University ISU Horticulture:Publications:2002 Turfgrass Report College of Agriculture

Iowa State University

106 Horticulture Hall
Ames, Iowa 50011
Phone: (515) 294-2751
Fax: (515) 294-0730
Website or Department-related Questions/Comments: hortdept@iastate.edu
Plant Questions: hortline@iastate.edu

Contents ©1995-2003, ISU Horticulture Department