1998 Iowa Turfgrass Research Report



1998 Iowa Turfgrass Research Report


Effects of Soil Amendments on the Chemical and Physical Soil Parameters of a Sand-based Golf Green

Young K. Joo, Nick E. Christians, Deying Li, and David D. Minner

The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of inorganic soil amendment materials Bio-ceramic, Profile, Axis, and Bio-Flex-A-Clay on the chemical and physical soil parameters of a sand-based golf green. Bio-ceramic is a ceramic material from Korea. Axis is a diatomaceous earth and Profile is a porous ceramic clay material. Bio-Flex-A-Clay is a polymer coated sand from a product of True Pitch, Inc. of Altoona, Iowa. The Bio-Flex-A-Clay is the same product with a kelp material incorporated on the Flex-A-Clay. A USGA type sand-based green was constructed in the summer of 1996. The green consisted of a 12-inch sand rootzone placed over a 4-inch gravel blanket. No intermediate "choaker" layer was used between the sand and the gravel blanket. The sand and pea gravel materials used in the plot met the particle size specifications of a USGA green. A network of 4-inch drain lines were trenched into the subsoil below the gravel blanket. No organic or inorganic amendments were used in green construction since they were added at a later date as treatments. The study area consisted of five treatments (Table 1) replicated six times. The 15 plots each measured 6 x 9 ft. The sand from each plot was removed to a 6-inch depth. The sand was combined with 5% volume/volume Dakota peat and 10% of each of the amendments as outlined in Table 1. The mixture was then replaced on the plot area and allowed to settle. The area was seeded with 1 lb. 'Crenshaw' creeping bentgrass/1000 ft2 in September of 1996. A 10-20-10 fertilizer was applied to supply 1 lb. N/1000 ft2 as a starter fertilizer.

 

Table 1. The five treatments established in the sand green.

 

Treatment
Sand %
Amendment %
Dakota Peat %

1

Control

95

0

5

2

Bio-ceramic

85

10

5

3

Profile

85

10

5

4

Axis

85

10

5

5

Bio-Flex-A-Clay

85

10

5

The grass was severely damaged by winter kill and was reseeded with 1.5 lb. Crenshaw/1000 ft2 on May 13, 1997. Starter fertilizer was reapplied at the same rate as that used in the fall.

The grass became fully established during the 1997 season. In November of 1997, soil samples were collected for chemical testing. The samples were submitted to Harris Laboratory of Lincoln, NE and a full set of chemical evaluations were conducted. Undisturbed-intact soil columns were collected in November 1997 to develop a water release curve and test other soil physical parameters. These tests included saturated water conductivity, water retention at 40 cm, and soil bulk density. Each treatment was also sampled immediately after plot construction to develop soil physical measurements on recompacted samples. The samples were recompacted according to United States Golf Association specifications and each test was repeated.

Establishment data for May, July, and August demonstrated that the Bio-Flex-A-Clay had a very positive effect on the growth of the creeping bentgrass during grow-in (Table 2). This material contains kelp, which evidently affected establishment.

In chemical analysis, Profile was most effective in increasing cation exchange of the media (Table 3). Profile also doubled the amount of exchangeable potassium (K) and increased magnesium (Mg) by nearly 50%.

Saturated water conductivity was reduced by Bio-Flex-A-Clay (Table 4). Profile and Axis increased water retention and decreased bulk density as compared to the control.

Water release curves were very similar for the control, Bio-ceramic, and Bio-Flex-A-Clay. The Profile and Axis both resulted in higher water retention at each of the pressure treatments from 0 to 2 bars (Figure 1).

 

We would like to acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China for partial support of this research.

 

Table 2. Establishment data (% cover) in May, July, and September of 1997.

 

Treatment
May
July
August
October

1

Control

10
60
77
100

2

Bio-ceramic

13
60
80
100

3

Profile

10
57
80
100

4

Axis

10
47
67
100

5

Bio-Flex-A-Clay

80
100
100
100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LSD0.05

5
15
13
-

 

Table 3. Soil test results for the inorganic soil modification study.

Treatments

CEC
PH
SS
Na
OM
NIT
P
K
Mg
Ca

Control

8.8
8.3
1
16
0.4
1
7.7

25

103

1551

Bio-ceramic

9.2
8.3
1
17
0.4
1
6.3

27

114

1625

Profile

9.5
8.2
1
20
0.4
1
7.7

51

145

1604

Axis

8.8
8.3
1
17
0.4
1
8.7

25

105

1548

Bio-Flex-A-Clay

8.0
8.3
1
14
0.5
1
7.3

24

1038

1394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LSD0.05

0.4
NS1
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS

8

14

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S
Zn
Mn
Cu
Fe
B
AK
AMg
ACa
ANa

Control

1.7
0.9
3.1
0.5
11.9
0.3
0.7

9.8

88.7

0.8

Bio-ceramic

1.0
1.4
3.6
2.1
15.5
0.3
0.8

10.3

88.1

0.8

Profile

1.3
0.9
2.9
0.9
17.3
0.3
1.4

12.8

84.9

0.9

Axis

1.7
0.7
3.3
0.4
15.3
0.3
0.7

10.0

88.4

0.9

Bio-Flex-A-Clay

2.7
1.2
3.3
0.9
11.9
0.3
0.8

11.3

87.2

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LSD0.05

NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.2

1.2

1.3

NS

1NS = Not significant at 0.05 level

CEC = Cation Exchange Capacity (meg/100g)

SS = Soluble salts (mmhos/cm)

Na = Sodium (ppm)

OM = Organic matter (%)

NIT = Nitrate N (ppm)

AK = Actual potassium (% base saturation)

AMg = Actual magnesium (% base saturation)

ACa = Actual calcium (% base saturation)

ANa = Actual sodium (% base saturation)

All others units = ppm

 

 

Table 4. Physical test for the inorganic modified soil.

 

Undisturbed

 

Recompacted
Treatment
Ksat1
Wret2
Db3

 

Ksa
Wre
Db

Control

45.7

24.1

1.49

 

34.0

21.9

1.49

Bio-ceramic

43.9

23.7

1.48

 

37.7

20.9

1.48

Profile

46.8

27.2

1.44

 

40.7

23.5

1.44

Axis

44.5

27.3

1.42

 

33.4

24.9

1.42

Bio-Flex-A-Clay

39.5

23.6

1.55

 

27.5

20.3

1.55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LSD0.05

3.8

1.2

0.05

 

3.5

2.2

0.04

1Ksat=Saturated water conductivity (cm/hr)

2Wret=Water retention at -40cm water pressure (% of water based on dry soil)

3Db=Soil dry bulk density (g/cm3)

4Recompacted according the undisturbed value

 

 

Figure 1. Soil moisture release curve for undisturbed samples of each amendment treatment completed in November 1997.

 




Iowa State University ISU Horticulture:Publications:1998 Turfgrass Report College of Agriculture